The Future of Alternative Search Engines


Every Thursday on AltSearchEngines, we invite a Guest Author to share his or her thoughts on the State of Search.  Interested?  Just email: Charles@ReadWriteWeb.com.  Today we welcome Nitin Karandikar from his Software Abstractions blog. 


Reactions: The Future of Alternative Search Engines

I recently wrote an article on this blog about the exit strategies for alternative search engines, that highlighted the recent and growing trend of publishers acquiring search engines; I also speculated about Charles Knight’s quest to get these Alts to band together in order to grow overall traffic. I’ve gotten interesting reactions to the piece from some prominent bloggers.

I’ve been a fan of Ashkan Karbasfrooshan, of the HipMojo blog, for a long time. When I asked him about the Alts, his response was as follows:

No one has a crystal ball to predict with enough accuracy what will happen in the next few years with regards to search, but clearly, history suggests that there is always a period of consolidation after innovation and growth, so that should happen in search too.  And, we’re seeing the big companies starting to have difficulty adding market share, it’s not like adding one of these fringe search engines (including MetaMojo when I refer to alt engines as fringe) will add market share to a major one, but sometimes by buying a small player, a major company adds technology, know-how, but most importantly, brainpower.  That is the single most important variable for who will win or lose in search over the next decade: you can best deploy technology and market it, and not who can best develop technology.

One thing I was unsure of was whether traditional media would be doing the buying, I think ultimately traditional media will partner with search companies because it is not in the DNA to understand which search companies to acquire… which is a shame, because it’s to old media that young search companies can most add value to…

David Berkowitz, of Inside The Marketers Studio stuck to his usual line where the Alts are concerned - he doesn’t think most of them are good enough to get acquired or survive on their own:

Honestly, I don’t think many of the alternative engines are good enough to be acquired, though a few will find that as an exit strategy, and a few others will survive as niche alternatives.

Microsoft’s Don Dodge, who has a terrific blog The Next Big Thing, got so interested that he wrote a separate blog post to address this question. Here’s a snippet from his post:

My thoughts? Some of these will be acquired by the big search engines or big content publishing networks. Most of them will fade away. I don’t see any of them breaking out and creating a significant stand alone business with the possible exceptions of Powerset, Hakia, and Mahalo.

Read Don’s post to find out where he thinks the big, untapped opportunities lie.

Bob Warfield, of the SmoothSpan blog, responded with an interesting blog post, proposing that:

Alt Search providers can get together and create an Open Sourced Collaborative Search-Oriented Social Network …

In essence, he argues that the Alts could get together to share the costs and burdens of web crawling and the underlying infrastructure. This would help them to reduce the gap with the big players, which have a huge advantage in terms of resources. You can find his post here.

Conclusion:

The overall consensus is that, unless something changes, most of the alternative search engines will not survive; some will get acquired and a few players may do well on their own, especially if they focus on a specific niche. A convergence in markets (e.g. local and mobile), or joint efforts on building the infrastructure, would give them a better chance.

Personally, I see the lack of web traffic as being the single biggest weakness of the alternative search engines; regardless of their cool technologies, innovative architectures or stunning visualizations, they cannot survive without getting the word out and capturing market share in search. There are simply too many web site destinations for the average user to remember. If the Alts could somehow cooperate to provide a single entry point that then branches off to different specializations, it would be a huge step forward!

Sphere: Related Content

4 Responses to “The Future of Alternative Search Engines”

  1. David Berkowitz says:

    I enjoyed the roundup, but I don’t think the lack of the web traffic is the issue. I just don’t see any of these as filling a huge void or demonstrating their value proposition. If they can do that, then maybe they can muster up the traffic.

  2. alphaxion says:

    I think the biggest future challenge will be more to do with fighting the scourge of spam and ranking manipulation, I wrote a very mumbled article where I asked the question of what the future holds for these spam infested search engines and how the market is going to fracture as the traditional idea of a search engine will morph in order to fight back (google has already begun doing this by trialling digg-like hit rating options).

    You can read my article here http://www.pissheadnerds.com/readarticle.php?article_id=8

  3. daniel rueda says:

    MyLocator is the greatest strategic domain portfolio ever created. No one will be able to compete with this multichannel vertical locator domain network. Location is the future of search. Premium vertical location will become more and more valuable as the cyberglut tidal wave hits all cyberland masses. The only survivors will be the engines with the greatest strategic vertical location.
    (High Ground survivors will be those that have a strategic top level internet presence)

    MyLocator.com
    Search Solved.

  4. Penny Herscher says:

    I think the issue for the alts is whether they have enough differentiation from the standard (read google). My company, FirstRain, sells to Wall St. In that market the name of the game is precision. Can you produce results that are highly relevant and just for the investors portfolio? If you can they buy the service (it’s subscription, not ad driven) if you can’t they don’t give you the time of day. We not only find and filter to high personal relevancy, we also detect patterns in the data so investors can detect trends early - the holy grail to portfolio managers.

    So, core differentiation is needed to survive in the face of dominant market share.

 

Leave a Reply

  Entries (RSS)  |  Comments (RSS) altsearchengines.com is proudly powered by WordPress  
© 2008 altsearchengines.com